No. They are three separately built properties that do not point at each other. faymas.in is the prompt marketplace where creators publish and get copied — its sitemap lists 11,854 URLs, 11,796 of them prompt pages. faymas.net is a paid generation studio that runs the models itself and indexes only 41 pages. faymas-in.com is a small WordPress prompt blog holding 19 prompts, every one of them posted across two days in September 2026. Publish on faymas.in, generate on faymas.net, and treat faymas-in.com as a reader site you cannot post to.
This guide compares three public faymas domains using their own sitemaps and page markup. No accounts were created and no generation tests were run.
The three-way split in one table
| faymas.in | faymas.net | faymas-in.com | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Prompt marketplace | Generation studio | Prompt blog |
| Indexed pages | 11,854 | 41 | No XML sitemap |
| Prompt pages | 11,796 | 12 | 19 |
| Can you publish? | Yes — creator programme | No publishing surface found | No — single author |
| How you pay | Free to browse; ad-supported | Credit plans from $9.9/mo | Free, no accounts |
| Build | Next.js + Ezoic ads | Next.js + Cloudflare R2 | WordPress + Rank Math |
Those three numbers — 11,854, 41, 19 — are the fastest way to see that these are not mirrors of one product. They are three orders of magnitude apart.
Scale is the tell
A mirror site does not have a different page count from its parent. These do, wildly.
faymas.in's sitemap breaks down as 11,796 /prompt/ pages, 27 blog posts, 12 /prompts/ landing pages, 9 categories and 4 /creator/ pages. It is a catalogue. The unit of the site is the individual prompt, and there are nearly twelve thousand of them.
faymas.net's 41 URLs point the other way. Twelve are prompts. The rest are model pages: /veo, /kling, /wan, /seedance, /nano-banana/ with two and three variants, /seedream/, /happyhorse, /gpt-image, /grok-imagine, /gemini-omni. The site is organised around the engines, not around the community. That is a tool company's information architecture, not a marketplace's.
faymas-in.com publishes no XML sitemap at all — both /sitemap.xml and /wp-sitemap.xml return the homepage HTML. Its content had to be counted through the WordPress REST API instead: 19 entries of a custom prompt post type, 2 blog posts, 8 static pages, 2 categories.
None of the three links to the others
We harvested every outbound link on all three homepages and filtered for the other two domains. The count was zero in all three directions.
That is an unusual result for properties run by one operator. A company with a marketplace and a studio almost always cross-promotes — a "generate this" button, a footer link, a shared header. There is none here. The only faymas domain each homepage links to is itself.
The self-descriptions reinforce the separation. faymas.net's About page states plainly: "Faymas AI is the independent operator and publisher of faymas.net." The homepage repeats it — "Faymas AI at faymas.net is an independent AI image and video creation studio." Two volunteerings of the word "independent" on one site is a deliberate signal, not filler.
faymas.in, meanwhile, describes itself as "a platform built for the next generation of AI creators" whose mission is to make prompts "easy to discover, share, and reward the people who create them." Its About page title carries the phrase "Earn Per Copy". Different sentence, different business.
Ownership is not established. We found nothing on any of the three pages naming a registrant, a company entity, or a shared operator. Whether one company runs all three is not found in this research, and we are not going to guess.
Different stacks, different revenue
The third-party hosts each page loads are a fingerprint, and the three fingerprints do not match.
- faymas.in loads
g.ezoic.net,go.ezodn.com,pagead2.googlesyndication.comandsecurepubads.g.doubleclick.net, plus the Ezoic consent manager atcmp.gatekeeperconsent.com. Advertising is how this site monetises traffic. - faymas.net loads none of those. Its media comes from Cloudflare R2 buckets, and its own strings mention "Sign in to generate", "Create Free Account" and "Pay as you go". It sells credits: the plan visible on its pricing page is 220 credits per month for $9.9, with yearly billing advertised at up to 23% off.
- faymas-in.com is WordPress —
s.w.org,api.w.org,stats.wp.com— running Rank Math for SEO and Jetpack for forms. No ad network, no checkout.
An ad-funded marketplace, a credit-funded studio, and a self-hosted blog with no monetisation at all. If one roadmap governed all three, this is not what it would look like.
faymas-in.com is two days old
Reading its REST API by publish date is the sharpest thing we found. All 19 prompts carry a date of either 22 September 2026 or 23 September 2026. Nothing before, nothing since.
Two more signals point the same way:
- Every prompt is attributed to
admin. There is no author system in use. - Its About page and Contact page both render placeholder text — the literal strings "fdggfdg" and "fgdfgdg" where company information should be.
- Its own Trending section renders an empty state: "Trending prompts will appear here when you mark prompts as Trending." Even its trending logic is hand-curated, not computed.
None of this makes it a bad site. It makes it a small one. But it means there is no submission path, no account, and no audience mechanism for a creator to plug into.
So which one do you use?
If you want your prompts seen and credited, use faymas.in. It is the only one of the three with a creator programme. Its guidelines page — effective 16 August 2026 — sets out ten rules, including "Provide an Accurate Prompt", "Don't Upload Duplicate or Nearly Identical Content" and "Don't Manipulate Faymas". Copy counts, saves and the Creator League all live here. Nothing on the other two domains offers an equivalent.
If you want to make the image or video, use faymas.net. It runs Veo, Kling, Wan, Seedance, Seedream, Nano Banana, GPT Image 2, HappyHorse and Grok Imagine as selectable workflows, and it shows a credit estimate before you generate. faymas.in does not generate anything; it hands you text.
faymas-in.com is a place to read, not to post. Nineteen prompts, one author, no accounts, no sitemap.
And do not assume an account carries across. Both faymas.in and faymas.net present a Google sign-in, but whether the two share an identity system is not confirmed — we found no shared auth domain and no cross-domain session handling on either homepage. Plan on two separate logins.
What this comparison cannot tell you
- Ownership and registration. Not found. No page on any of the three names an operating entity beyond faymas.net's own claim of independence.
- Whether accounts are shared. Not tested. Verifying it would require creating accounts on both.
- Whether faymas.net's "hundreds of prompts" is accurate. Its About page claims hundreds; its sitemap indexes 12 prompt pages. The in-app gallery may hold more than what is indexed. We report the gap and leave it unresolved.
- Why faymas-in.com shares the name. Unknown. Same word, different stack, different author model, no links between them.
- Page counts are snapshots. Both sitemaps were fetched on 30 September 2026. faymas.in's catalogue grows daily; the 11,854 figure will be stale quickly.
PromptPlank publishes independently and has no affiliation with any of the three sites. No prompt text or creator name was reproduced from them.
The practical takeaway
Stop treating "faymas" as one destination and start treating it as a verb with three objects: you publish on .in, you render on .net, and you read on -in.com. The mistake worth avoiding is spending a week crafting prompts for the wrong one — faymas-in.com will never show your byline, and faymas.net will never count your copies. Bookmark the .in creator page, keep your credit budget on .net, and check the domain bar before you paste anything.